4.2 Article

Assessment of agreement between EXTEM and NATEM thromboelastometry measurement assays in critically ill neonates

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
卷 109, 期 4, 页码 327-335

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ejh.13812

关键词

critically ill neonates; EXTEM; NATEM; method comparison; rotational thromboelastometry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This retrospective observational study investigates the agreement between EXTEM and NATEM measurements in ill neonates. The results show a strong correlation and good agreement between the two methods, indicating that they can be used interchangeably.
Objectives To investigate the agreement between the EXTEM and NATEM measurements. Methods In this retrospective observational study, EXTEM and NATEM analyses were performed on blood samples from 162 ill neonates, providing 324 paired measurements. The agreement between EXTEM and NATEM measurements was evaluated by the nonparametric spearman's rank correlation to assess the correlation between the paired measurements, by the Bland-Altman analysis for the graphical presentation of the agreement, and by the Deming regression model to assess the significance of the agreement. The agreement between the two methods for the detection of bleeding events was determined by kappa statistic. Results Strong correlations were found between EXTEM and NATEM measurements for A10, MCF. The Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement for A10, MCF, LI60, and alpha angle parameters, while CT showed a nearly linear slope indicating that bias increased with the mean. The highest agreement for bleeding events was found for the A10 parameter (kappa = 0.70, p < .001), while the lowest for the CT parameter (kappa = 0.36, p = .94). Conclusions NATEM parameters that reflect clot firmness and fibrinolytic activity are strongly correlated with the corresponding EXTEM measurements with a good agreement between them, indicating that these two methods could be used interchangeably.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据