4.4 Article

Damage evolution of sandstone based on acoustic emission under different seepage conditions

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19648189.2022.2098178

关键词

Sandstone; seepage; acoustic emission; damage evolution; deterioration mechanism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the crack development and damage evolution of sandstone under different seepage conditions. The experimental results show that the crack stress thresholds and mechanical properties of sandstone decrease with increasing water pressure. Additionally, water pressure has a significant influence on the deformation behavior of sandstone.
The stability and safety of rock mass in underground constructions are influenced by the damage processes of cracks evolution caused by the excavation under coupled hydro-mechanical loading conditions. In this paper, to understand the crack development and damage evolution of sandstone under different seepage conditions, a series of triaxial compression tests with acoustic emission under different water pressures (5, 10, 15 MPa) are carried out. The stress-strain behavior, crack stress thresholds, failure mode, AE characteristics and micromechanical mechanisms are analyzed and discussed. The experimental results demonstrate that the crack stress thresholds and the mechanical property of studied sandstone decrease with the increase of water pressure. Moreover, the water pressure has an important influence on and deformation behavior of sandstone, for instance, the elastic modulus and deformation modulus decreased when the water pressure increased. Based on the result of accumulated ring counts, the damage evolution of sandstone gradually increased with increasing water pressure. Finally, the micro-structural evolution under the coupling effects of water pressure and applied stress is discussed. The obtained results can be used to identify the initiation and propagation of studied sandstone in the engineering applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据