4.2 Article

Modulation of epileptiform activity by three subgroups of GABAergic interneurons in mouse somatosensory cortex

期刊

EPILEPSY RESEARCH
卷 183, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2022.106937

关键词

Neocortex; GABAergic interneurons; Epileptiform activity; Optogenetics

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health, USA [NS090041, P30 NS047466]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Different subclasses of GABAergic interneurons play distinct roles in the initiation and modulation of epileptiform discharges in cortical networks.
4-Aminopyridine (4-AP) induces ictal-like epileptiform discharges in a variety of brain regions. These events are associated with enhanced inhibitory and excitatory synaptic neurotransmission. The relative contribution of specific subclasses of GABAergic interneurons (INs) to epileptiform activity in the 4-AP model is not well characterized. We have used genetically encoded channelrhodopsin (ChR) and Archaerhodopsin (Arch) expression in parvalbumin (PV), somatostatin (SST) and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) INs to investigate the role of interneuron subclasses in 4-AP-induced epileptiform discharges. Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were obtained from L5 pyramidal cells (PYRs) in somatosensory cortex of 30-to-70-day old mice. In the presence of 100 mu M 4-AP, photostimulation of ChR in PV and SST, but not VIP INs, evoked epileptiform discharges similar to spontaneous and electrically evoked events. Light activation of Arch in PV INs was more effective in reducing epileptiform activity compared to SST and VIP INs. Epileptiform discharges were evoked at offset of Arch induced hyperpolarizations in PV and SST interneurons but not VIP INs. PV and SST INs could both initiate and inhibit 4-AP-induced epileptiform activity in L5 PYRs. VIP INs did not contribute significantly to eliciting or inhibiting epileptiform discharges. These results suggest that subclasses of INs contribute differently to the initiation and modulation of epileptiform discharges in cortical networks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据