4.4 Article

Investigation of different molecular weight Polyvinylidene Fluoride (PVDF) polymer for the fabrication and performance of braid hollow fiber membranes

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2022.2112092

关键词

Braid reinforced hollow fiber membrane; membrane fabrication; membrane bioreactor; polyvinylidene fluoride; wastewater treatment

资金

  1. Istanbul Technical University (Turkey)
  2. National Research Center on Membrane Technologies MEMTEK (Turkey)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, braid reinforced membranes were fabricated using two different molecular weights of PVDF polymers. The blending of the polymers improved the membrane performance, resulting in a hydrophilic structure with a smoother surface. The investigation showed that the blend membrane had less adsorption of pollutants and reduced fouling.
In the current study, braid reinforced membranes were fabricated from polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) polymers with two different molecular weights, and the blending of the polymers in a 1:1 ratio to upgrade the performance of the membrane. Characterization, filtration studies, and membrane bioreactor (MBR) application were done to evaluate membrane performance by applying the same operation conditions on each membrane. Characterization studies indicated that the fabricated membrane from blending polymers was a hydrophilic structure with a contact angle of 50.78 degrees and smoother surface properties compared to the other fabricated membranes. According to the MBR results, at the end of the operation process, TMP levels of the membrane from the blending method are found 150 mbar, membrane from high molecular weight PVDF polymer had 250 mbar, and membrane from low molecular weight PVDF polymer had 800 mbar. As a consequence of the investigation, it is seen that the hydrophilic structure of the membrane allows the pollutant to adsorb less to the blend membrane surface, and the lower roughness is also a factor in reducing fouling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据