4.7 Article

Effects of airflow rate and plant species on formaldehyde removal by active green walls

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 59, 页码 88812-88822

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-21995-0

关键词

Phytoremediation; Active green wall; Indoor air pollution; Formaldehyde removal

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2682020ZT99]
  2. Chengdu Science and Technology Project [2019-YF05-02268-SN]
  3. Sichuan Province Social Science Planning Project [SC21B143]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed the formaldehyde removal ability of an active green wall system and found that airflow rate, formaldehyde concentration, and plant species significantly affect its efficacy.
Formaldehyde is a hazardous volatile organic compound (VOC) listed as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The active green wall system is a promising technology that utilizes active airflow passing through plants grown along a vertical alignment to increase their mass exposure to pollutants. However, few studies have investigated the effect of airflow rate on their efficacy for formaldehyde removal, and plant-mediated effects are unknown. This study assessed the formaldehyde removal ability of the active green wall using dynamic experiments. Three levels of airflow rate (30, 50, and 65 m(3)center dot h(-1)) and inlet formaldehyde concentration (1.0, 2.0, and 3.5 mg center dot m(-3)) were used and three plant species were investigated. The removal of formaldehyde by active green walls was significantly (P < 0.01) affected by the airflow rate, formaldehyde concentration, and plant species. The single pass removal efficiency varying from 38.18 to 94.42% decreased as the airflow rate and formaldehyde concentration increased. The elimination capacity varied from 189 to 1154 mg center dot m(-2)center dot h(-1) and increased with the inlet formaldehyde loading rate. Significant differences in formaldehyde removal effectiveness among the plant species were observed with Chlorophytum comosum performing the best, followed by Schefflera octophylla, with Chamaedorea elegans being the worst.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据