4.7 Article

Magic extraction: solid-phase extraction and analytical pyrolysis to study polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon and polychlorinated biphenyls in freshwater

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 42, 页码 64252-64258

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-22435-9

关键词

PCBs; PAHs; Pyrolysis; Gas chromatography; Mass spectrometry; Thermal desorption

资金

  1. Universita di Pisa within the CRUI-CARE Agreement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a new solventless solid-phase extraction method was tested for the analysis of persistent organic pollutants. The method showed better performance compared to previous devices, with lower limits of detection and quantification. It also showed potential for characterizing other chemical species, such as phthalate plasticizers and antioxidants.
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and polychlorinated biphenyls are commonly categorized as persistent organic pollutants. In order to analyze these pollutants, customized stationary phases are increasingly being developed and synthesized for solid-phase extraction. In this work, we tested a new solventless solid-phase extraction approach based on the use of a Magic Chemisorber (R) (Frontier Lab) which consists of a bead-covered polydimethylsiloxane stationary phase with a thickness of 500 mu m. These devices are directly immersed into aqueous samples and then introduced into a pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry system equipped with a cryofocusing system for the thermal desorption and analysis of the adsorbed species. Our new method performs better than the most recent solid-phase extraction devices, with limits of detection lower than 2.7 ng/L and limits of quantification lower than 9.0 ng/L. The method was tested on standard compounds and on an environmental sample, showing the potential to characterize other chemical species besides the persistent organic pollutants, such as phthalate plasticizers and antioxidants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据