4.7 Article

Structural and impedance spectroscopic investigations of eco-friendly alkali phosphoborate glass-ceramics containing zirconium ion

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 44, 页码 98609-98618

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-21867-7

关键词

Glass-ceramic; Nano-crystallites; Infrared spectroscopy; Nyquist diagram; Dielectric constant; Modulus analysis; AC conductivity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glass-ceramics with novel composition have been synthesized using melt quench technique, and their dielectric and electrical properties have been characterized. The results indicate that these glass-ceramics show promising potential as eco-friendly and safe dielectric materials.
Glass-ceramics with novel composition xZrO(2)center dot 7P(2)O(5)center dot 19CaO center dot 24Na(2)O.(50-x)B2O3 (x=0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 mol%) have been synthesized using melt quench technique. The synthesized compositions were characterized and analyzed by X-ray diffraction, field emission scanning electron microscopy, infrared absorption, and impedance spectroscopy. X-ray diffraction profiles of prepared samples confirm the existence of phases corresponding to Na3Ca6(PO4)(5) crystal (with crystallite size similar to 23 nm). Infrared absorbance spectra reveal the presence of phosphate and borate units (PO3, PO4, BO3, BO4) in the glass matrix. Different dielectric parameters such as dielectric loss, electric modulus, and tangent loss were evaluated. Their variations with temperature and frequency confirm the nonDebye relaxation behavior of prepared samples. A phenomenal description of the capacitive behavior was studied by considering the circuit having a parallel combination of constant phase element and bulk resistance. The conduction is found to be governed by overlapping large polaron tunneling (OLPT) and follow OLPT model. The results indicate that ZrO2 substituted alkali phosphoborate glass-ceramics can be used as eco-friendly and safe dielectric materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据