4.7 Article

Zeolite fly ash-enhanced coagulation treatment of oil recovery wastewater from polymer flooding

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 60, 页码 90318-90327

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-22035-7

关键词

Oil recovery wastewater from polymer flooding; Coal fly ash; Zeolite fly ash; Enhanced coagulation; Crystal nucleus

资金

  1. Northeast Petroleum University Youth Science Fund Project [2019QNL-30]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes an enhanced coagulation model using zeolite as a crystal nucleus to promote flocs. Zeolite is prepared from fly ash by microwave-assisted hydrothermal synthesis and characterized using SEM, XRD, BET analysis. The results show improved surface properties and adsorption capacity of ZFA as a crystal nucleus, leading to higher oil content and SS removal rate compared to conventional coagulation. The optimal conditions for ZFA-enhanced coagulation are identified.
Herein, an enhanced coagulation model is proposed in which zeolite is used as a crystal nucleus to promote flocs. The zeolite is prepared from fly ash by microwave-assisted hydrothermal synthesis. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and specific surface area and pore size analysis (BET) characterization confirmed the successful synthesis of ZFA, and improved the surface properties. Thus, the adsorption capacity of ZFA as crystal nucleus was improved, which enabled it to achieve better results in the process of enhanced coagulation. Compared with those of conventional coagulation, the oil content and SS removal rate of ZFA-enhanced coagulation increased by 85% and 44%, respectively. Compared with that of CFA-enhanced coagulation, the oil removal efficiency increased by 4%, and the SS removal efficiency increased by 9%. The optimal conditions of ZFA-enhanced coagulation were as follows: ZFA dosage of 100 mg/L, pH value of 5-8, ZFA particle size range of 60-75 mu m, temperature of 40-50 celcius, and precipitation time of 30 min.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据