4.7 Article

Ni-alginate hydrogel beads for establishing breakthrough curves of lead ions removal from aqueous solutions

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 53, 页码 80716-80726

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-21305-8

关键词

Alginate beads; Environmental protection; Fixed-bed column; Lead ions; Breakthrough modeling

资金

  1. Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF)
  2. Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The scientific impact of this work lies in the protection of the environment from hazardous pollutants using a column technique. Ni-alginate has been found to be a stable and efficient sorbent for removing lead ions, making it recommended for selective removal of Pb2+ from waste solutions. The breakthrough curves and modeling analysis further support the effectiveness of Ni-alginate.
The scientific impact of this work is the protection of the environment from hazardous pollutants using a column technique. Besides its higher stability at working pH and its time persisting, Ni-alginate has a higher ability to remove lead ions compared to the other prepared beads (Sr-alginate, Co-alginate, and Ca-alginate). Also, Ni-alginate possessed a higher removal percent, 93.3%, toward Pb2+ than the other ions, taking the sorption order of Pb2+ > Sr2+ > Co2+ > Cd2+ > Zn2+. Therefore, this study focused on using Ni-alginate as a selective sorbent for lead ions. Fixed-bed column was employed for the sorption process. The results for that efficiency are presented as breakthrough curves in view of the impact of various parameters; influent flow rate (1.5, 3.0, and 5.0 mL/min), lead concentration (100, 150, and 200 mg/L), and bed depth of sorbent (3.0, 5.0, and 7.0 cm). Breakthrough modeling including Thomas and Yan models was employed. The outcomes indicated that Thomas theory is more applicable. The overall outcomes indicated that Ni-alginate is recommended for selective removal of Pb2+ from waste solutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据