4.7 Article

Pesticide risk assessment: honeybee workers are not all equal regarding the risk posed by exposure to pesticides

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 60, 页码 90328-90337

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-21969-2

关键词

Apis mellifera; Nurse; Forager; Pesticide sensitivity; Pesticide metabolization; Risk quotient

资金

  1. European Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [773921]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Toxicological studies have found that honeybees' responses to pesticides can vary due to individual differences in pesticide sensitivity and exposure. This study focused on the risk of pesticides to nurse and forager bees, which have different physiological backgrounds. The results showed that forager bees were more sensitive to sulfoxaflor compared to nurse bees, potentially due to differences in body weight. Additionally, foragers consumed more sugar syrup, especially when it was contaminated with pesticides. The study suggests that forager bees should be included in regulatory tests to ensure accurate assessment of pesticide risks to honeybees.
Toxicological studies in honeybees have long shown that a single pesticide dose or concentration does not necessarily induce a single response. Inter-individual differences in pesticide sensitivity and/or the level of exposure (e.g., ingestion of pesticide-contaminated matrices) may explain this variability in risk posed by a pesticide. Therefore, to better inform pesticide risk assessment for honeybees, we studied the risk posed by pesticides to two behavioral castes, nurse, and forager bees, which are largely represented within colonies and which exhibit large differences in their physiological backgrounds. For that purpose, we determined the sensitivity of nurses and foragers to azoxystrobin (fungicide) and sulfoxaflor (insecticide) upon acute or chronic exposure. Azoxystrobin was found to be weakly toxic to both types of bees. However, foragers were more sensitive to sulfoxaflor than nurses upon acute and chronic exposure. This phenomenon was not explained by better sulfoxaflor metabolization in nurses, but rather by differences in body weight (nurses being 1.6 times heavier than foragers). Foragers consistently consumed more sugar syrup than nurses, and this increased consumption was even more pronounced with pesticide-contaminated syrup (at specific concentrations). Altogether, the stronger susceptibility and exposure of foragers to sulfoxaflor contributed to increases of 2 and tenfold for the acute and chronic risk quotients, respectively, compared to nurses. In conclusion, to increase the safety margin and avoid an under-estimation of the risk posed by insecticides to honeybees, we recommend systematically including forager bees in regulatory tests.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据