4.8 Article

Integrated Modeling of US Agricultural Soil Emissions of Reactive Nitrogen and Associated Impacts on Air Pollution, Health, and Climate

期刊

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c08660

关键词

agricultural soil emissions; nitrogen oxides (NOx); ammonia (NH3); nitrous oxide (N2O); agroecosystem models; FEST-C; reduced-form air quality and health models; APEEP

资金

  1. Carbon Hub at Rice University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Agricultural soils are major sources of reactive nitrogen species, which have variable impacts on health and climate. This study compares the air quality impacts and climate impacts of nitrogen emissions across different regions. The results show that air quality impacts are larger in heavily populated areas, while they are smaller in sparsely populated areas.
Agricultural soils are leading sources of reactive nitrogen (Nr) species including nitrogen oxides (NOx), ammonia (NH3), and nitrous oxide (N2O). The propensity of NOx and NH3 to generate ozone and fine particulate matter and associated impacts on health are highly variable, whereas the climate impacts of long-lived N2O are independent of emission timing and location. However, these impacts have rarely been compared on a spatially resolved monetized basis. In this study, we update the nitrogen scheme in an agroecosystem model to simulate the Nr emissions from fertilized soils across the contiguous United States. We then apply a reduced-form air pollution health effect model to assess air quality impacts from NOx and NH3 and a social cost of N2O to assess the climate impacts. Assuming an $8.2 million value of a statistical life and a $13,100/ton social cost of N2O, the air quality impacts are a factor of similar to 7 to 15 times as large as the climate impacts in heavily populated coastal regions, whereas the ratios are closer to 2.5 in sparsely populated regions. Our results show that air pollution, health, and climate should be considered jointly in future assessments of how farming practices affect Nr emissions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据