4.8 Article

Electrocatalytic Upcycling of Nitrate Wastewater into an Ammonia Fertilizer via an Electrified Membrane

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 56, 期 16, 页码 11602-11613

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c08442

关键词

electrified membrane flow-cell; paired electrolysis method; nitrate reduction; ammonia recovery; separation science

资金

  1. NSF PFI-TT project
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2021MB003, ZR2021QB205]
  3. INTERN program [2016472]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents an electrified membrane technology for converting wastewater nitrogen into ammonia fertilizer, achieving high removal efficiency of nitrate and ammonia recovery rate.
Electrochemically upcycling wastewater nitrogen such as nitrate (NO3-) and nitrite (NO2-) into an ammonia fertilizer is a promising yet challenging research topic in resource recovery and wastewater treatment. This study presents an electrified membrane made of a CuO@Cu foam and a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane for reducing NO3- to ammonia (NH3) and upcycling NH3 into (NH4)(2)SO4, a liquid fertilizer for ready-use. A paired electrolysis process without external acid/base consumption was achieved under a partial current density of 63.8 +/- 4.4 mAmiddotcm(-2) on the cathodic membrane, which removed 99.9% NO3- in the feed (150 mM NO3-) after a 5 h operation with an NH3 recovery rate of 99.5%. A recovery rate and energy consumption of 3100 +/- 91 g-(NH4)(2)SO(4)middotm(-2)middotd(-1) and 21.8 +/- 3.8 kWhmiddotkg(-1)-(NH4)(2)SO4, respectively, almost outcompete the industrial ammonia production cost in the Haber-Bosch process. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations unraveled that the in situ electrochemical conversion of Cu2+ into Cu(1+ )provides highly dynamic active species for NO3- reduction to NH3. This electrified membrane process was demonstrated to achieve synergistic nitrate decontamination and nutrient recovery with durable catalytic activity and stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据