4.7 Review

Methods for the assessment of health risk induced by contaminants in atmospheric particulate matter: a review

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 20, 期 5, 页码 3289-3311

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10311-022-01461-6

关键词

Cancer risk; Exposure pathways; Non-cancer risk; Particulate matter

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Air pollution is a significant issue for human health, leading to over 7 million premature deaths each year from indoor and outdoor pollution. Exposure to particulate matter is associated with adverse health effects in the short and long term. Evaluating the health risks caused by exposure to contaminants in particulate matter is challenging due to the presence of multiple pollutants and the multiple causes of observed diseases. This review discusses advanced methods for assessing cancer and non-cancer risks from exposure to specific contaminants in particulate matter, including ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact, as well as different age categories of the population.
Air pollution is a major issue for human health with more than 7 million premature deaths per year due to indoor and outdoor air pollution. Exposure to particulate matter is correlated with adverse health effects in the short and long run. Evaluating the health risk from exposure to particulate matter is challenging because particulate matter contains many contaminants and observed diseases result from multiple causes. Here we review advanced methods for the evaluation of cancer and non-cancer risks induced by exposure to contaminants in particulate matter. Contaminants include polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, phthalates, dioxins, furans, dioxin-like polychlorobiphenyls, and major and trace elements. We discuss risk assessment by ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact, and for population age categories. We observe that the highest contributions to cancer risk come from benzo[a]pyrene, indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene, benzo[k]fluoranthene, dibenz[a,h]anthracene, chromium, arsenic, cadmium, and cobalt.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据