4.7 Article

Large-scale synthesis of water-soluble luminescent hydroxyapatite nanorods for security printing

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 468, 期 -, 页码 300-306

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.01.078

关键词

Hydroxyapatite nanorods; Europium doping; Colloidal stability; Luminescence; Security printing

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21203059]
  2. National Training Program of Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Undergraduates [201410500001]
  3. Doctor Foundation of Hubei University of Technology [BSQD12043]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Luminescent hydroxyapatite nanoparticles, which have excellent biocompatibility, excellent photostability, and strong fluorescence, have received increasing attention as bioprobes in cell imaging. However, they are also excellent candidates for use in ink-jet security printing. Successful products for related applications usually require highly crystalline, mono-dispersible hydroxyapatite nanorods with good colloidal stability and high fluorescence in aqueous media. These requirements are hard to simultaneously satisfy using most synthetic methods. In this paper, we report a simple and versatile hydrothermal method that incorporates the use of sodium citrate to prepare water-dispersible Eu3(+)-doped hydroxyapatite nanorods. The hydroxyapatite nanorods obtained using this method are highly crystalline rod shaped particles with an average length of 50-80 nm and an average diameter of 15-30 nm. Dispersions of these hydroxyapatite nanorods, which are transparent with a slightly milky color under natural light and a bright red color when excited with 241 nm UV light, display zeta potentials of -35 mV and hydrodynamic diameters of 120 nm. These dispersions remain colloidally stable for a few months. Dispersions with these properties could be easily applied to security printing for confidential information storage and anti-counterfeiting technologies. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据