3.9 Article

Pyrolysis of landfill liability of industrial waste for charcoal generation

期刊

ENGENHARIA SANITARIA E AMBIENTAL
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 523-531

出版社

ASSOC BRASILEIRA ENGENHARIA SANITARIA AMBIENTAL
DOI: 10.1590/S1413-415220200348

关键词

landfill; environmental liability; pyrolysis; catalytic pyrolysis; charcoal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the capacity to produce coal from waste in the central region of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. By using low-temperature pyrolysis technique and a catalyst, pyrolyzed samples with energy generation characteristics were obtained. However, the presence of heavy metals needs to be further investigated for their use as fuel, and the potential as fertilizer needs to be addressed.
In this study, the capacity to produce coal from Class IIA residues landed in an Environmental Protection Foundation in the central region of the state of Rio Grande do Sul was evaluated. The samples were composed (in mass/ mass ratio) of 40% plastic, 25% paper/cardboard, 25% foam and synthetic rubbers, and 10% cotton fabric and cellulose casings. Low temperature (350 degrees C) pyrolysis technique was used with a heating ramp of 2.70 degrees C min(-1) and a residence time of 30 minutes. The experiments were done with and without catalyst, with 25% catalyst, consisting of red clay. In the pre-crude and pyrolysates, the Lower Calorific Power (LCP), the Higher Calorific Power (HCP), and the Useful Calorific Power (UCP) were obtained. The samples also characterized organic carbon, ash content, chlorides, as well as aluminum, antimony, barium, cadmium, calcium, lead, cobalt, copper, total chromium, iron, magnesium, manganese, nickel, potassium, silver, sodium, and zinc. Pyrolyzed samples with catalyst showed PCU values of 5,473 kcal kg(-1), having an interesting characteristic for energy generation. However, the presence of heavy metals, especially Ni and Cr, deserves attention regarding their use as fuel. The potential for fertilizer information is also critical, being discussed in this research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据