4.7 Article

Constant volume combustion chamber (CVCC) investigations of aerospace F-24 and Jet-A in low-temperature heat release and negative temperature coefficient regions

期刊

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
卷 263, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115687

关键词

CVCC; F24; LTHR; NTCR; Combustion phasing; NVH

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1950207]
  2. Div Of Engineering Education and Centers
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1950207] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the combustion characteristics and vibrations of aerospace fuel F24, finding that F24 has a longer combustion delay and releases more energy during low temperature heat release. The study also reveals a correlation between the vibrations and the combustion characteristics of F24 and compares them with those of Jet-A.
A study was conducted to determine the characteristics of Low Temperature Heat Release, Derived Cetane Number, and the Vibrations, produced by the combustion of aerospace F24 using Jet-A as a baseline in a Constant Volume Combustion Chamber. The Ignition Delay and Combustion Delay for F-24 were found to be 4.04 ms and 5.71 ms with a DCN resulting at 43.77. Jet-A was found to have a larger DCN of 47 with an ignition delay and combustion delay of 3.35 ms and 5.14 ms. F24 has an extended region of cool flame and releases more of its energy during LTHR than Jet-A, however has a much shorter NTCR than that of Jet-A. From the NVH analysis it was found that there exists a strong correlation between the ID and CD phases and their respective NVH spectrum. It was found that the magnitude of the ringing for Jet-A was 3x higher than that of F24. Meanwhile, the magnitude of vibrations produced by Jet A was approximately 0.5 g greater than those produced by F24 & PRIME;s combustion which correlates well with the higher peak value of AHRR for Jet A and also with higher ringing produced by Jet A compared with F24.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据