4.7 Article

A comparative study on hybrid power-to-liquids/power-to-gas processes coupled with different water electrolysis technologies

期刊

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
卷 263, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115671

关键词

Power-to-liquids; Power-to-gas; Water electrolysis; Process modelling; Technical comparison

资金

  1. Next Generation Carbon Upcycling Project through the National Research Foundation (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea [2017M1A2A2043133]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20200694, 20KJB530002, 21KJB480014]
  3. Jiangsu Specially-Appointed Professors Program
  4. open program of the State Key Laboratory of High-efficiency Utilization of Coal and Green Chemical Engineering [2021-K32]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, the Power-to-Liquids (PTL) and Power-to-Gas (PTG) processes have gained significant attention as carbon-neutral technologies, due to their ability to transform wasted CO2 into sustainable liquid fuels and synthetic natural gas while storing excess and intermittent renewable energy. Hydrogen production, achieved through various water electrolysis technologies, plays a key role in both PTL and PTG processes. This study systematically compares the effects of different water electrolysis technologies on the technical performance of PTL/PTG hybrid processes. The results show that the proposed processes are essential candidates for CO2 transformation, with the PTL/PTG hybrid process combined with solid oxide electrolysis (SOEC) being more competitive in terms of energy and exergy efficiencies, and the process combined with anion exchange membrane electrolysis (AEM) exhibiting higher carbon efficiency and net CO2 reduction rate.
Recently, Power-to-Liquids (PTL) and Power-to-Gas (PTG) processes have been attracting extensive attentions as carbon-neutral technologies because they transform wasted CO2 into sustainable liquid fuels and synthetic natural gas, meanwhile storing the excess and intermittent renewable energies into stable chemical energies. In both PTL and PTG processes, hydrogen production is a key step, which can be achieved by using different water electrolysis technologies, such as alkaline water electrolysis (AWE), anion exchange membrane electrolysis (AEM), proton exchange membrane electrolysis (PEM) and solid oxide electrolysis (SOEC). In this work, to implement a systematic comparison of the effects of different water electrolysis technologies on the technical performances of the PTL/PTG hybrid process, we proposed four PTL/PTG hybrid process cases coupled with the aforementioned water electrolysis technologies, and conducted a detailed comparative technical analysis in terms of energy efficiency, carbon efficiency, net CO2 reduction rate and exergy efficiency. The results revealed that all the proposed process cases can be considered as essential candidate technologies for CO2 transformation, and the PTL/PTG hybrid process combined with SOEC is more competitive in terms of energy and exergy efficiencies, whereas that combined with AEM shows higher carbon efficiency and net CO2 reduction rate. Moreover, we also compared the process performances of the PTL/PTG hybrid processes combined with SOEC via the direct and indirect routes. It seems that both the indirect and direct ones are comparable in energy and exergy efficiencies. However, the direct one benefits CO2 mitigation, while, the indirect one favors syncrude production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据