4.7 Article

Evolution of Stable Free Radicals during Bio-Oil Pyrolysis and Its Relation to Coke Formation: An in Situ EPR Study

期刊

ENERGY & FUELS
卷 36, 期 14, 页码 7608-7616

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c01475

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [52122608, 51976074]
  2. Analytical and Testing Centre of Huazhong University of Science and Technology
  3. Equipment Centre in State Key Laboratory of Coal Combustion, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stable free radicals generated during bio-oil pyrolysis are related to bio-oil polymerization and coke structure change. These free radicals have different activation energies, mainly generated from the polymerization of bio-oil.
Thermal-chemical conversion is needed to improve the quality of bio-oil. When bio-oil is heated, it polymerizes to form coke, causing severe problems to its upgrading processes and thus hindering its further utilization. As stable free radicals are generated and attached to coke during the active radical polymerization of bio-oil, figuring out the evolution of stable free radicals is a key to revealing the coke formation mechanisms. In this study, bio-oil pyrolysis was conducted between 300 and 600 degrees C, coupled with in situ electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) detection. The results indicate that the stable free radicals generated during pyrolysis are related to bio-oil polymerization and coke structure change. In the heating stage, the stable free radicals are generated from the polymerization of bio-oil and the condensation of coke, and the process can be expressed by two first-order kinetics with activation energies of 14.57 and 10.51 kJ/mol, respectively. The aromatic structure stable radicals are generated mainly by the polymerization of bio-oil with an activation energy of 12.66 kJ/mol. In the cooling stage, the free radical reaction would be caused by coke shrinkage, leading to further changes in coke structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据