4.7 Article

Optimal sizing and comparative analysis of rooftop PV and battery for grid-connected households with all-electric and gas-electricity utility

期刊

ENERGY
卷 251, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123876

关键词

Battery energy storage system; Gas and electricity utility; Grid-connected household; Optimal sizing; Rooftop solar PV

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the optimal sizing and economic analysis of rooftop solar photovoltaic (PV) and lithium-ion battery energy storage system (BESS) for grid-connected households. The key finding highlights that the PV-BESS system is more economic for all-electric houses.
This study evaluates the optimal sizing and economic analysis of the rooftop solar photovoltaic (PV) and lithium-ion battery energy storage system (BESS) for grid-connected households. Two types of households are investigated, i.e., all-electric homes and those supplied with both gas and electricity. Each type of household is investigated under three system configurations: (i) without PV and BESS, (ii) with PV only, and (iii) with PV and BESS (PV-BESS) system. The objective is to minimize the net present value (NPV) of operating each type of house and examine the impact of the generation and storage technologies on these. For the all-electric household, gas demand is converted to electricity demand based on the gas and electric cooking and water heating appliance efficiencies used in this study. The houses NPVs are calculated using real monitored gas and electricity usage data, along with measured, solar irradiation and ambient air temperatures. It is found that the NPV varies for the all-electric and the gas and electric house, and is more prominent for the customers with gas and electric when no PV and BESS are installed. However, the key finding of this study highlights that the PV-BESS system is more economic for the all electric houses. (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据