4.7 Article

On the evaluation of Representative Elementary Area for porosity in shale rocks by Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy

期刊

ENERGY
卷 253, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124141

关键词

Representative Elementary Area; Porosity; Shale; FESEM

资金

  1. YPF
  2. Y-TEC
  3. CONICET

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) is commonly used for shale characterization. This study proposes a novel method based on the Zcontrast criterion to identify Representative Elementary Area (REA) in shale. The results show a large spread in the porosity data computed in different areas of the same sample, but the Zcontrast criterion leads to a lower spread in porosity values.
Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) is commonly used to characterize shales at the nanoscale, but nevertheless, its use in quantitative analysis is still limited. High-resolution images over large areas can be acquired by FESEM and dedicated software, identifying pores with diameters around 20 nm. Although from image analysis is possible to account for a large number of pores, a crucial question is whether these images are representative of larger areas of the rock. The evaluation of Representative Elementary Area (REA) in shale is essential to perform a reliable analysis of the pore space and porosity. The intrinsic heterogeneity of the system sets the requirement for the definition of the minimum area where the property can be determined and the largest area that it represents. This paper shows that porosity data computed in different randomly selected areas of the same sample exhibit a large spread. A novel method to identify REA based on the selection of areas with similar mineralogy, named Zcontrast criterion, is proposed. This method leads to a noticeable lower spread on the porosity values. Porosity distribution between Organic Matter (OM) and minerals by a trainable machine learning software is also determined and compared with independent measurements. (c) 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据