4.7 Article

Techno-economic analysis and case study of combined heat and power systems in a wastewater treatment plant

期刊

ENERGY
卷 260, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125106

关键词

Combined heat and power (CHP); Biogas; Internal combustion engine; Wastewater treatment plant

资金

  1. City of Phoenix [147496]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Combined heat and power systems can reduce energy and carbon footprints of wastewater treatment plants, but high capital costs may deter their installation. This study uses annual and hourly data to size a combined heat and power system for a wastewater treatment plant and calculates the savings. The results show discrepancies between the annual and hourly analyses, mainly due to the variability in biogas and natural gas consumption.
Combined heat and power systems can reduce the energy and carbon footprints of wastewater treatment plants by reducing their electricity demand and direct methane emissions. However, large capital costs can be a deterrent for installation of such systems. Therefore, this work sizes a combined heat and power system based on annual and hourly biogas production data, thermal demand data, and electrical demand data of a wastewater treatment plant located in the Southwestern U.S. The annual analysis sizes a combined heat and power system to satisfy 60% of the facility's thermal demand and yields 13.94 million USD in savings over a 20 year analysis. Conversely, the hourly analysis sizes a combined heat and power system to satisfy 75% of the facility's thermal demand and results in 8.92 million USD in savings over a 20 year analysis. This discrepancy between the annual and hourly analyses is partially due to the biogas and natural gas consumptions. This paper shows that an annual analysis cannot accurately estimate combined heat and power sizing and savings for a wastewater treatment plant due to high variability in biogas production and time of use demand costs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据