4.7 Article

Wind tunnel test and numerical study of a multi-sided wind tower with horizontal heat pipes

期刊

ENERGY
卷 260, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125118

关键词

Passive ventilation; Wind tower; Wind tunnel testing; Computational fluid dynamics; Heat recovery; Heat pipes

资金

  1. Scottish Research Partnership in Engineering [SRPe-IDP/012]
  2. Free Running Buildings Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates that a passive ventilation and heat recovery system can be effectively achieved in wind towers using an array of heat pipes, resulting in increased ventilation rates and expanded operational window. Further development of the system, through the installation of a seasonal thermal loop, can provide heating in winter and cooling in summer.
Passive ventilation such as wind towers can ventilate spaces by using regional pressure differences and the stack effect. Wind towers are often closed throughout the winter to prevent an increase in heating energy demand. Heat pipes can be installed to transfer heat from the outgoing to the incoming air, however the inclusion of heat recovery can incur a pressure drop that negatively impacts ventilation rates. Here it is shown that with an array of horizontally arranged heat pipes, ventilation rates of 0.1 m3/s are maintained at a 1 m/s inlet velocity. The incoming air temperature was raised by up to 2.8 degrees C, thereby increasing the operational window of the passive ventilation system. By mounting the heat pipes horizontally through the wind tower, direct heat transfer is facilitated between the inlet and outlet. The results demonstrate how a passive ventilation and heat recovery system is likely to operate in the winter months of a cooler climate according to the wind speed and temperature difference between the fresh and exhaust air. It is intended that this system will be further developed to provide both heating and cooling in the winter and summer respectively by installing a seasonal thermal loop.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据