4.7 Article

Alleviation of ammonia inhibition in dry anaerobic digestion of swine manure

期刊

ENERGY
卷 253, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124149

关键词

Ammonia inhibition; Dry anaerobic digestion; Granular activated carbon; Organic load rate; Swine manure

资金

  1. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2021ZDZX0012]
  2. China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA [CARS 35]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of granular activated carbon (GAC) and organic load rate (OLR) on semi-continuous dry anaerobic digestion of swine manure were investigated. The study found that dry anaerobic digestion of swine manure has a good methane production rate and application prospects under appropriate OLR. As OLR increases, the ammonia nitrogen concentration initially increases and then decreases, with the addition of GAC contributing to improved biogas production efficiency.
The effects of granular activated carbon (GAC) and organic load rate (OLR) on semi-continuous dry anaerobic digestion of swine manure were investigated. A kinetic model of anaerobic digestion provided a good description of the quantitative effect of OLR on the methane production rate, with a maximum methane production rate of 1.46 and 1.60 LCH4/L/d without and with addition of GAC, respectively; this rate reached approximately 80% of the reported maximum methane production rate for the wet anaerobic digestion of swine manure, thus suggesting favorable application prospects of dry anaerobic digestion of swine manure. With an increase in OLR from 1.0 to 5.0 g TS/L/d, the ammonia nitrogen concentration increased from 3433 to 4094 mg/L; after the OLR reached 7.0 g TS/L/d, the ammonia nitrogen concentration decreased, to 3654 mg/L at 7.0 g TS/L/d and 2324 mg/L at 9.0 g TS/L/d, and ammonia inhibition was alleviated. The improvement in the biogas production efficiency with the addition of GAC was apparent at the start-up stage and under high OLR (> 7.0 g TS/L/d).(C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据