4.7 Article

A new three-triangle based method to linearly concave hydropower output in long-term reservoir operation

期刊

ENERGY
卷 250, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123784

关键词

OR in Energy; Long-term reservoir operation; Piecewise linearization; Hydropower output function; Linear programming

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a new three-triangle based method for linearizing the hydropower output function, which can solve the hydropower scheduling problem. The method achieves comparable fitting accuracy to the all-triangle based method but is much faster in solving the problem.
The nonlinearity and non-convexity of the hydropower output function (HOF) make it very challenging to search for the optimal solution to the hydropower scheduling problem, which however can be more easily solved with consistency by mathematical programming if the HOF can be properly linearized with high accuracy. This paper presents a new three-triangle based method to linearly concave the HOF without introducing any integer variables, and mathematically proves its equivalence in fitting accuracy to the all-triangle based method in which any active plane needs to be compared with all the other active planes to ensure it is active within its triangular grid, making the number of constraints be increased dramatically. The two methods are applied in approximating the HOFs of 4 hydropower reservoirs located in the Lancang River. The case studies show that the present linearization method can achieve a root-mean-square error (RMSE) at 2.05% on average of the installed power capacity, the same as the allgrid concaving method, but takes only less than 0.097s in solving the problem, 80 times faster than the all-grid concaving method. The present method should be very promising in solving the real-world hydropower scheduling problems, especially when the linearization needs to be done frequently during the solution procedure. (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据