4.7 Article

Operational optimization of a 4th generation district heating network with mixed integer quadratically constrained programming

期刊

ENERGY
卷 250, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123766

关键词

Heat pump; Optimization; MIQCP; Low temperature district heating; Waste heat

资金

  1. BMWK (German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action) [03EGB0010A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates operational optimization of a 4th-generation district heating network with regards to temperatures and use of thermal inertia. A case study demonstrates that quadratic formulations can optimize energy balances and temperatures, resulting in cost savings of up to 18.2%.
Decreasing CO2-Emissions is a common goal for efficient energy system design and operation. An efficient design for the heating sector are 4th-generation district heating networks with waste heat integration. This paper focuses on operational optimization of a 4th-generation district heating network with regards to temperatures and use of thermal inertia in the network and in thermal energy storages. A case study is presented, where the system is formulated as a Mixed-Integer Quadratically Constrained Program. The quadratic formulations allow to simultaneously optimize energy balances and temperatures, with regards to efficiency correlations and temperature thresholds of components. The case study consists of seven consumers with heat pumps and thermal energy storages, which are supplied by waste heat from a nearby high-performance computer. The case study is solved for eight representative days. The results show, that savings in operational costs up to 18.2% compared to a reference system with constant temperatures are possible. All in all, this paper demonstrates the use and limitations of quadratic formulations in an operational optimization and emphasizes the possibility of temperature optimizations in operation of 4th-generation district heating. (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据