4.5 Article

Regenerative Braking Logic That Maximizes Energy Recovery Ensuring the Vehicle Stability

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 15, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en15165846

关键词

regenerative braking logic; electric vehicle; EV; energy optimization; energy recovery; vehicle stability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a regenerative braking logic that maximizes energy recovery during braking while ensuring vehicle stability. By exploiting the regenerative torque of the electric motor(s), the logic avoids wheel locking and integrates with the traditional braking system if needed. The priority of the logic is to maximize energy recovery, followed by optimal braking distribution. Simulation tests on different drivetrains show significant fuel consumption reductions compared to other common logics.
This paper presents a regenerative braking logic that aims to maximize the recovery of energy during braking without compromising the stability of the vehicle. This model of regenerative braking ensures that the regenerative torque of the electric motor (for front- and rear-wheel drive vehicles) or electric motors (for all-wheel drive vehicles equipped with one motor for each axle) is exploited to the maximum, avoiding the locking of the driving wheels and, subsequently, if necessary, integrating the braking with the traditional braking system. The priority of the logic is that of maximizing energy recovery under braking, followed by the pursuit of optimal braking distribution. This last aspect in particular occurs when there is an integration of braking and, for vehicles with all-wheel drive, also when choosing the distribution of regenerative torque between the two electric motors. The logic was tested via simulation on a front-, rear-, and all-wheel drive compact car, and from the simulations, it emerged that, on the WLTC driving cycle, the logic saved between 29.5 and 30.3% in consumption compared to the same vehicle without regenerative recovery, and 22.6-23.5% compared to a logic commonly adopted on the market. On cycle US06, it saves 23.9-24.4% and 19.0-19.5%, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据