4.4 Article

Precocious puberty due to intracranial germ cell tumors: a case control study

期刊

ENDOCRINE-RELATED CANCER
卷 29, 期 10, 页码 581-588

出版社

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/ERC-21-0381

关键词

germinoma; germ cell tumor; precocious puberty; human chorionic gonadotropin; gonadotropin independent

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Children with intracranial germ cell tumors may experience premature sexual development caused by either GnRH-dependent or GnRH-independent factors. This retrospective study found that GnRH-independent precocious puberty often regressed together with tumor regression.
Children with intracranial germ cell tumors may present premature sexual development via either gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-dependent cause or GnRH-independent cause. We conducted a single-center retrospective study on 37 precocious puberty (PP) patients with intracranial germ cell tumors and 25 age-matched prepubertal patients with elevated human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels. Classification of PP was derived from hCG, gonadotropin and sex steroid levels and their changes. Five boys were assigned to GnRH-dependent group (G1). Thirty-one boys and one girl were assigned to GnRH-independent group (G2) with a median hCG of 76.75 (8.29-2747) IU/L. Seven boys and 18 girls were conducted as controls, with a median hCG of 17.12 (2.91-1062) IU/L. Patients in G1 had constant pubertal LH and testosterone levels after tumor complete response. Patients in G2 had hCG levels that decreased simultaneously with testosterone/estradiol levels, prior to tumor regression. The differences in hCG levels and the gender ratio were significant between G2 and controls (P = 0.006 and P < 0.001, separately). Among intracranial germ cell tumor patients with positive hCG, boys with significantly higher hCG levels more easily developed PP. Our results suggest that GnRH-independent PP commonly regresses together with tumor regression. In comparison, results were inconclusive in tying tumor regression to the regression of GnRH-dependent PP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据