4.7 Article

The potential and realized foraging movements of bees are differentially determined by body size and sociality

期刊

ECOLOGY
卷 103, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3809

关键词

allometry; Anthophila; central place foraging; movement ecology; pollinator conservation

类别

资金

  1. Strategic Research Environment BECC (Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in a Changing Climate)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The size and sociality of species have an effect on their potential and realized foraging ranges. Larger body size corresponds to larger potential and realized ranges. Highly eusocial species have larger realized foraging ranges than primitively eusocial or solitary taxa.
Reversing biodiversity declines requires a better understanding of organismal mobility, as movement processes dictate the scale at which species interact with the environment. Previous studies have demonstrated that species foraging ranges, and therefore, habitat use increases with body size. Yet, foraging ranges are also affected by other life-history traits, such as sociality, which influence the need of and ability to detect resources. We evaluated the effect of body size and sociality on potential and realized foraging ranges using a compiled dataset of 383 measurements for 81 bee species. Potential ranges were larger than realized ranges and increased more steeply with body size. Highly eusocial species had larger realized foraging ranges than primitively eusocial or solitary taxa. We contend that potential ranges describe species movement capabilities, whereas realized ranges depict how foraging movements result from interactions between species traits and environmental conditions. Furthermore, the complex communication strategies and large colony sizes in highly eusocial species may facilitate foraging over wider areas in response to resource depletion. Our findings should contribute to a greater understanding of landscape ecology and conservation, as traits that influence movement mediate species vulnerability to habitat loss and fragmentation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据