4.7 Article

Time-dependent NIR fluorescent probe with large Stokes-shift for detecting Cys/Hcy and cell imaging

期刊

DYES AND PIGMENTS
卷 203, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2022.110320

关键词

NIR; Fluorescence probe; Cys; Hcy; Cell imaging

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41867052, 21861017, 41867053]
  2. Project of the Science Funds of Jiangxi Education Office [GJJ211135]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation for PhD of Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University [2021BSQD34]
  4. Masters' Innovative Foundation of Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University [YC2021-S753]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a fluorescent probe named DTRN was synthesized for the detection and imaging of Cysteine and Homocysteine in living systems. DTRN exhibited excellent sensitivity, specificity, and fast response, and it was also capable of detecting Cysteine in HeLa cells.
Detection and imaging of Cysteine (Cys) and Homocysteine (Hcy) in living systems have drawn extensive attention over the years due to their significant biological role. However, few fluorescence probes have been reported to distinguish Cys and Hcy in near-infrared (NIR) range. In this paper, an original NIR Cys and Hcy fluorescent probe, namely DTRN, was synthesized. DTRN was constructed by using an acryloyl ester group as a trigger and dicyanoisophorone-derived as the fluorophore unit, it was found to emit NIR fluorescence with a 718 nm emission and have large stokes shift (~176 nm). DTRN hold excellent performances such as ultrasensitivity (LOD = 0.09 mu M), high specificity and fast response (< 2 min) for Cys. Distinctly, after Hcy was introduced, the emission intensity of DTRN at 718 nm must take 20 min to reach a plateau and the LOD was found to be 0.12 mu M. The sensing mechanism for Cys and Hcy in C2H5OH/PBS (4/6, v/v, pH = 7.4) was studied by 1H NMR spectroscopy and HRMS. Most importantly, the ability of DTRN to detect Cys in HeLa cells had also been achieved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据