4.4 Article

Analysis of dried blood spots is a feasible alternative for detecting ephedrine in doping control

期刊

DRUG TESTING AND ANALYSIS
卷 14, 期 10, 页码 1685-1695

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dta.3338

关键词

anti-doping; dried blood spot; ephedrine; plasma; sampling site

资金

  1. Dried Blood Spot Project [DBS20AS7JM]
  2. Anti Doping Denmark

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dried blood spot (DBS) testing is a fast, easy and minimally invasive method for collecting microvolumes of blood, and it has particular relevance in anti-doping control. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using alternative sampling sites and matrices for ephedrine analysis in DBS testing.
Dried blood spot (DBS) testing allows fast, easy and minimally invasive collection of microvolumes of blood. In an anti-doping context, DBS testing has particular relevance for substances prohibited in-competition only such as ephedrine, which is currently detected by urine analysis, because DBS can add information about the blood drug concentrations during the in-competition period. Several collection methods and devices exist for DBS collection from different anatomical sites. Thus, agreements between concentrations of target analytes in DBS samples from different sampling sites, along with between DBS and those in conventional venous plasma samples, need to be evaluated. Herein, we collected matched upper-arm DBS, fingerprick DBS and venous plasma samples from eight healthy male subjects in an 8-h period following oral administrations of 20 mg ('low dose') and 60 mg ('high dose') of ephedrine. We show that the use of alternative sampling sites and matrices is a feasible possibility for ephedrine analysis in doping control. We observed very good agreement between collection sites and that specificity and sensitivity can be upheld despite use of an alternative collection site. However, potential concentration differences between DBS and venous plasma should be considered, and distinct threshold might be necessary if implementing both blood matrices in ephedrine analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据