4.5 Article

BLSSpeller to discover novel regulatory motifs in maize

期刊

DNA RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/dnares/dsac029

关键词

comparative genomics; de novo motif discovery; cis-elements; Zea mays

资金

  1. Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek-Vlaanderen (FWO) [3G046318, G.0371.06]
  2. UGent BOF [BOF/IOP/2022/045, 01J06219]
  3. Flanders Innovation & Entrepreneurship (VLAIO) [HBC.2019.2528]
  4. Ministry of Science, Research and Technology, Iran

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used a motif discovery algorithm to identify novel motifs in maize, and found that some of these motifs were functional and associated with transcription factor binding sites and open chromatin.
With the decreasing cost of sequencing and availability of larger numbers of sequenced genomes, comparative genomics is becoming increasingly attractive to complement experimental techniques for the task of transcription factor (TF) binding site identification. In this study, we redesigned BLSSpeller, a motif discovery algorithm, to cope with larger sequence datasets. BLSSpeller was used to identify novel motifs in Zea mays in a comparative genomics setting with 16 monocot lineages. We discovered 61 motifs of which 20 matched previously described motif models in Arabidopsis. In addition, novel, yet uncharacterized motifs were detected, several of which are supported by available sequence-based and/or functional data. Instances of the predicted motifs were enriched around transcription start sites and contained signatures of selection. Moreover, the enrichment of the predicted motif instances in open chromatin and TF binding sites indicates their functionality, supported by the fact that genes carrying instances of these motifs were often found to be co-expressed and/or enriched in similar GO functions. Overall, our study unveiled several novel candidate motifs that might help our understanding of the genotype to phenotype association in crops.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据