期刊
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM
卷 65, 期 12, 页码 1475-1482出版社
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002401
关键词
Pelvic exenteration; Quality of life; Rectal cancer
This study compared the surgical outcomes and quality of life of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and locally recurrent rectal cancer undergoing pelvic exenteration. The results showed differences in surgical outcomes, but no significant differences in quality of life within 12 months postoperatively.
BACKGROUND: Although pelvic exenteration remains the only curative option for locally advanced rectal cancer and locally recurrent rectal cancer, only limited evidence is available on the differences in surgical and quality-of-life outcomes between the two. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare surgical outcomes and identify any differences or predictors of quality of life of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and locally recurrent rectal cancer undergoing pelvic exenteration. DESIGN: This was a cohort study. SETTING: This study was conducted at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia. PATIENTS: This study included patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and locally recurrent rectal cancer who underwent pelvic exenteration between July 2008 and March 2019. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures included Short Form 36 version 2 and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal score. RESULTS: A total of 271 patients were included in this study. Locally advanced rectal cancer patients had higher rates of R0 resection (p = 0.003), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (p < 0.001), and had greater median overall survival (75.1 vs. 45.8 months), although the latter was clinically but not statistically significant. There was a higher blood loss (p < 0.001), longer length of stay (p = 0.039), and longer operative time (p = 0.002) in the locally recurrent rectal cancer group. This group also had a higher mean baseline physical component summary score and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal score; however, there were no significant differences in complications or quality-of-life outcomes between with the two groups at any time points postoperatively up to 12 months. LIMITATION: The study was from a specialized experienced center, which could limit its generalizability. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer tend to require a more extensive surgery with a longer operative time and more blood loss and longer recovery from surgery, but despite this, their quality of
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据