4.3 Article

Ceftobiprole activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens causing bone and joint infections in the United States from 2016 to 2020

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115713

关键词

?-lactam; cephalosporin; MRSA; surveillance; osteomyelitis

资金

  1. Department of Health and Human Services
  2. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response
  3. Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority [HHSO100201600002C]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bone and joint infections (BJIs) are difficult to treat, but ceftobiprole, a broad-spectrum cephalosporin, has shown potent activity against various pathogens in vitro. This study supports further evaluation of ceftobiprole as a potential treatment option for BJIs.
Bone and joint infections (BJIs) present significant treatment challenges. Ceftobiprole, a broad-spectrum cephalosporin with activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, is approved in many European and other countries for the treatment of adults with community-and hospital-acquired pneumonia, excluding ventilator-associated pneumonia. In this study, the in vitro activity of ceftobiprole and comparators was evaluated against clinical isolates collected from BJIs in the USA from 2016 to 2020. Gram-positive pathogens made up 70.6% of all BJI isolates and included S. aureus (47.4% of all isolates), beta-hemolytic streptococci, coagulase-negative staphylococci, and Enterococcus faecalis. Ceftobiprole was highly active against S. aureus (MIC50/90 values, 0.5/1 mg/L; 99.6% susceptible using the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing susceptibility breakpoint of <= 2 mg/L for the treatment of pneumonia patients) and exhibited potent activity against the other Gram-positive cocci and the predominant BJI Gram-negative groups. These results support the further evaluation of ceftobiprole for this potential indication. (C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据