4.4 Article

Impact of Temporary Glycemic Target Use in the Hybrid and Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop Systems

期刊

DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
卷 24, 期 11, 页码 848-852

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/dia.2022.0153

关键词

Closed-loop systems; Continuous glucose monitoring; Insulin pump; Time in range

资金

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [C4DK10861]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This analysis compared the efficacy of the Medtronic advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) system with that of the MiniMed (TM) 670G hybrid closed-loop (HCL) system after the temporary increase of glucose target. The study found that there were similar differences in blood glucose control between the two systems after the use of the temporary target setting and during periods where this setting was not used.
The Medtronic advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) and MiniMed (TM) 670G hybrid closed-loop (HCL) systems provide the option to temporarily increase the glucose target to 150 mg/dL (8.3 mmol/L). This analysis investigated the efficacy of the AHCL compared with that of the HCL after the use of this setting. Data from 60 participants in the Fuzzy Logic Automated Insulin Regulation (FLAIR) study were used to compare the AHCL and HCL systems after the use of the temporary target (TT), and during analogous periods where this setting was not used. Differences in time in range 70-180 mg/dL between the systems were similar after the use of the TT setting and during analogous non-TT periods (interaction P = 0.87). Similar trends were observed for mean glucose, percentage time >180 mg/dL, and percentage time >250 mg/dL. Differences between AHCL and HCL systems were similar after the use of the TT setting compared with those of non-TT periods.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03040414

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据