4.0 Review

Central Positional Nystagmus

期刊

CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN NEUROLOGY
卷 24, 期 10, 页码 453-484

出版社

CURRENT MEDICINE GROUP
DOI: 10.1007/s11940-022-00731-6

关键词

Central positional nystagmus; Positional vertigo; Nystagmus treatment; Cerebellar ataxia; Aminopyridines

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review evaluates the treatment options for central positional nystagmus (CPN) and highlights the heterogeneity in treatment response. Various therapeutic approaches have been suggested for different etiologies of CPN.
Purpose of review Central positional nystagmus (CPN) is attributed to disease affecting the central vestibulo-cerebellar pathways. It can be associated with prominent vertigo, oscillopsia, and dysautonomia. Its treatment highly depends on the etiology, and response is fairly heterogenous. This review presents a critical appraisal of CPN therapies. Recent findings Anecdotal reports have stated efficacy of 3,4-diaminopyridine, 4-aminopyridine, and clonazepam in downbeating CPN secondary to structural lesions. In tumors, CPN may improve after tumoral resection and radiotherapy. In multiple sclerosis, intravenous steroids may abate CPN during a relapse. In paraneoplastic CPN, remission has been occasionally observed after tumoral excision, but relapses may follow. In autoimmune ataxia, intravenous immunoglobulin and oral baclofen have been shown to improve upbeating CPN. In genetic ataxia, acetazolamide seems to be more effective in resolving ictal episodes than non-ictal CPN and ataxia. In vestibular migraine, prophylactic treatment seems to provide long-term improvement of attacks manifesting with CPN. Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation has abolished CPN in a vestibular migraine attack. CPN secondary to toxics not responding to drug discontinuation might need further treatment such as midazolam or clonazepam. Prospective randomized placebo-controlled treatment trials using objective baseline, short- and long-term assessments of CPN, and related symptoms are highly needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据