4.4 Review

Towards effective data sharing in ophthalmology: data standardization and data privacy

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 33, 期 5, 页码 418-424

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000878

关键词

artificial intelligence; interoperability; ophthalmology; privacy; standards

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health Office of the Director Grant (Bethesda, MD, USA) [DP5OD029610]
  2. Research to Prevent Blindness (New York, NY, USA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Standardization and privacy are seen as complementary aspects of data sharing in ophthalmology. Recent developments include government regulations, common data models, and technologies like blockchain and synthetic data to address privacy concerns. Further work is still needed in certain areas.
Purpose of review The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of updates in data standardization and data privacy in ophthalmology. These topics represent two key aspects of medical information sharing and are important knowledge areas given trends in data-driven healthcare. Recent findings Standardization and privacy can be seen as complementary aspects that pertain to data sharing. Standardization promotes the ease and efficacy through which data is shared. Privacy considerations ensure that data sharing is appropriate and sufficiently controlled. There is active development in both areas, including government regulations and common data models to advance standardization, and application of technologies such as blockchain and synthetic data to help tackle privacy issues. These advancements have seen use in ophthalmology, but there are areas where further work is required. Summary Information sharing is fundamental to both research and care delivery, and standardization/privacy are key constituent considerations. Therefore, widespread engagement with, and development of, data standardization and privacy ecosystems stand to offer great benefit to ophthalmology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据