相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。Assessment criteria for research misconduct: Taiwanese researchers' perceptions
Chien Chou et al.
ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY (2023)
Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands
Gowri Gopalakrishna et al.
PLOS ONE (2022)
Methods to assess research misconduct in health-related research: A scoping review
Esmee M. Bordewijk et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)
Large survey finds questionable research practices are common
Jop de Vrieze
SCIENCE (2021)
Generating translatable evidence to improve patient care: the contribution of human factors
Masoud A. M. Afnan et al.
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE (2020)
Artificial intelligence and automation of systematic reviews in women's health
Carmen Amezcua-Prieto et al.
CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY (2020)
Changing how we evaluate research is difficult, but not impossible
Anna Hatch et al.
ELIFE (2020)
The Academic Viewpoint on Patient Data Ownership in the Context of Big Data: Scoping Review
Martin Mirchev et al.
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH (2020)
The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity
David Moher et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2020)
Research integrity: nine ways to move from talk to walk
Niels Mejlgaard et al.
NATURE (2020)
Retracted articles in the obstetrics literature: lessons from the past to change the future
Carrie Bennett et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM (2020)
Reducing research waste through the standardisation of outcomes and definitions
E. Rogozinska et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2019)
Research Integrity: Doing the Right Thing, Even When No One Is Watching
Helen W. Lach
CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH (2019)
Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Clinical Trials
Howard Bauchner et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2019)
Randomised controlled trials - the gold standard for effectiveness research Study design: randomised controlled trials
Eduardo Hariton et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2018)
DATA SHARING: THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY
Kurt T. Barnhart
FERTILITY AND STERILITY (2018)
Involving pregnant women, mothers and members of the public to improve the quality of women's health research
N. Moss et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2017)
Barriers to the conduct of randomised clinical trials within all disease areas
Snezana Djurisic et al.
TRIALS (2017)
GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research
S. Staniszewska et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2017)
GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research
S. Staniszewska et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2017)
Peer reviewers identified spin in manuscripts of nonrandomized studies assessing therapeutic interventions, but their impact on spin in abstract conclusions was limited
Clement Lazarus et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)
Systematic review and statistical analysis of the integrity of 33 randomized controlled trials
Mark J. Bolland et al.
NEUROLOGY (2016)
A Global, Neutral Platform for Sharing Trial Data
Barbara E. Bierer et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2016)
Why Most Clinical Research Is Not Useful
John P. A. Ioannidis
PLOS MEDICINE (2016)
Beyond lip service and box ticking: how effective patient engagement is integral to the development and delivery of patient-reported outcomes
K. Absolom et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2015)
The CROWN Initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women's health
Khalid Khan
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2014)
Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review
Jo Brett et al.
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS (2014)
Heterogeneity in European Research Integrity Guidance: Relying on Values or Norms?
Simon Godecharle et al.
JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS (2014)
A Stronger Post-Publication Culture Is Needed for Better Science
Hilda Bastian
PLOS MEDICINE (2014)
Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?
R. Grant Steen et al.
PLOS ONE (2013)
Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign
Daniele Fanelli
PLOS MEDICINE (2013)
Misconduct versus Honest Error and Scientific Disagreement
David B. Resnik et al.
ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY (2012)
The Singapore Statement on Research Integrity
David B. Resnik et al.
ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE (2011)
Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes
Isabelle Boutron et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2010)
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration
Alessandro Liberati et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2009)
A case for a duty to feed the hungry: GM plants and the third world
Lucy Carter
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS (2007)
The architecture of evidence-based gynaecology
Khalid S. Khan
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY (2006)
Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions
NH Steneck
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS (2006)
Critical appraisal in clinical practice: sometimes irrelevant, occasionally invalid
A Coomarasamy et al.
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE (2001)
The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration
DG Altman et al.
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2001)
分享论文
