4.8 Article

A dicentric bacterial chromosome requires XerC/D site-specific recombinases for resolution

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 32, 期 16, 页码 3609-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.06.050

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01GM141242, R01GM120337]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Unlike eukaryotes and archaea, bacterial chromosomes usually have a single replication origin. However, a dicentric bacterial chromosome with two replication origins was discovered in Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and both replication origins and their partitioning systems are essential for cell survival.
Unlike eukaryotes and archaea, which have multiple replication origins on their chromosomes, bacterial chromosomes usually contain a single replication origin.(1) Here, we discovered a dicentric bacterial chromosome with two replication origins, which has resulted from the fusion of the circular and linear chromosomes in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. The fused chromosome is well tolerated, stably maintained, and retains similar subcellular organization and genome-wide DNA interactions found for the bipartite chromosomes. Strikingly, the two replication origins and their partitioning systems are both functional and necessary for cell survival. Finally, we discovered that the site-specific recombinases XerC and XerD(2) are essential in cells harboring the fused chromosome but not in cells with bipartite chromosomes. Analysis of actively dividing cells suggests a model in which XerC/D are required to recombine the sister fusion chromosomes when the two centromeres on the same chromosome are segregated to opposite cell poles. Thus, faithful segregation of dicentric chromosomes in bacteria can occur because of site-specific recombination between the sister chromatids during chromosome partitioning. Our study provides a natural comparative platform to examine a bacterial chromosome with multiple origins and a possible explanation for the fundamental difference in bacterial genome architecture relative to eukaryotes and archaea.(1)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据