4.7 Article

Corrosion behaviors and mechanism of CrFeNi2 based high-entropy alloys

期刊

CORROSION SCIENCE
卷 207, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2022.110562

关键词

High-entropy alloys; Phase; Repassivation; Passivity

资金

  1. Research Program of Hebei University [521000981398]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Metastable Materials Science and Technology [202212]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a novel CrFeNi2-based multi-component alloy system was designed and investigated for its corrosion behaviors in a salt solution. The results showed that the CrFeNi2-based alloys exhibited better corrosion resistance due to the compact and stable oxide films. All examined specimens in the alloy system suffered localized corrosion, while the Co-free CrFeNi2 alloy demonstrated the best corrosion resistance.
Herein, a novel CrFeNi2-based multi-component alloy system was designed and the corrosion behaviors were investigated in 3.5 wt% NaCl solution. The single-phase FCC solid solution was observed in CrFeNi2 and CoCrFeNi2 alloys, while the lamellar eutectic structure composed of dual-phase formed in the AlCoCrFeNi2 alloy. The electrochemical results showed that the CrFeNi2-based alloys, with higher Epit and lower Icorr, displayed better corrosion resistance, outperforming previously reported conventional alloys and some other high entropy alloys, due to the compact and stable oxide films composing of protective oxide/hydroxide. In the CrFeNi2-based alloy system, all examined specimens were suffered localized corrosion. The Co-free CrFeNi2 alloy possessed the best corrosion resistance, demonstrating the widest passivation region (approximately 1035 mVAg/AgCl), the highest pitting potential (954 mVAg/AgCl), and an outstanding repassivation ability. In addition, the corrosion mechanism was investigated and discussed. This research will sight light on the comprehending of corrosion behaviors through different phases and the effect of element on corrosion resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据