4.5 Review

Preservatives in non-cosmetic products: Increasing human exposure requires action for protection of health

期刊

CONTACT DERMATITIS
卷 87, 期 5, 页码 389-405

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cod.14181

关键词

biocide; exposure; formaldehyde releaser; isothiazolinone; legislation; prevention; skin sensitization; temporal trend

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The widespread use of skin sensitizing preservatives is well-known, but their use in non-cosmetic products is less recognized. This study reviewed EU legislations and analyzed data trends to find that the use of preservatives has significantly increased, posing a risk to health. Urgent action is needed to protect public health.
The widespread use of skin sensitizing preservatives is well-known. Contact allergy to preservatives is often caused by their presence in cosmetic products. Preservative use in non-cosmetic products is less well-known. We have reviewed European Union (EU) legislations on classification and labelling, biocides and cosmetics, concerning conditions for use of the most used sensitizing preservatives (including formaldehyde-releasing substances, isothiazolinones and parabens). We have analysed temporal trends in their use in non-cosmetic products (tonnes, number of products, concentrations), based on annual reports to the Swedish Products Register 1995-2018; and we discuss implications for stakeholders. Major changes over time are that the use of most of the preservatives has increased by tonnes and/or by number of products, and that several use concentrations have declined following harmonized classification as a skin sensitizer with low concentration limits for this classification. We conclude that the massive increase in use of preservatives is alarming, and that urgent action is needed for protection of health. Their use in non-cosmetic products is broad, increasing and often undisclosed. In the EU, legislations concerning chemicals can provide relevant restrictions to reduce their use and associated health risks, monitored by efficient surveillance. Prevention would be benefited by better coordination between legislations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据