4.7 Article

Effect of moisture content on hygrothermal properties: Comparison between pith and hemp shiv composites and other construction materials

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 340, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127731

关键词

Bio-based materials; Hygrothermal properties; Hemp shiv; Sunflower and maize pith; Rammed earth; Moisture

资金

  1. French environmental and energy management agency (ADEME)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper experimentally assesses the impact of water content on the thermal properties of pith and hemp shiv composites. The results show that the thermal conductivity, thermal effusivity, heat capacity, and vapor permeability all increase with relative humidity. In addition, the study reveals that the specific heat capacity cannot always be deduced from the specific heat of water and dry material alone, and liquid water transport plays a significant role in moisture transfers.
This paper deals with the experimental assessment of the influence of water content on thermal conductivity, thermal effusivity, heat capacity and vapor permeability of pith and hemp shiv composites. The results, which will be used to enrich modelling databases, show that all four properties increase their value with relative humidity, especially for pith composites, while remaining within adequate margins. They are compared to the results commonly measured for other porous construction materials, namely hemp concrete, wood, and rammed earth. This comparison allows to better understand the influence of the material morphology and nature on hygrothermal properties in presence of moisture. It has been noted that, in hygroscopic conditions, the specific heat cannot always be deduced from the specific heat of water and of the dry material due to the interactions between the adsorbed water and the material. On the other hand, the transport of liquid water has been observed to play a significant role in the hygroscopic transfers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据