4.7 Article

Mathematical formulations for project scheduling problems with categorical and hierarchical skills

期刊

COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
卷 169, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2022.108147

关键词

Project scheduling; Resource-constrained scheduling; Skills; (Mixed-)integer linear programming

资金

  1. Ghent University
  2. FWO
  3. Flemish Government - department EWI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, six extensions to the multi-skilled resource-constrained project scheduling problem (MSRCPSP) are presented by introducing hierarchical levels of skills. The impacts of these hierarchical skills on the MSRCPSP are studied, including efficiency differences, cost differences, quality differences and more. Seven continuous and time-indexed (mixed-)integer linear programming formulations are proposed and analyzed for each of these problems. Computational experiments are conducted using a modular artificial dataset. The results of the different formulations for the resource-constrained project scheduling problems with hierarchical levels of skills are compared to explain their inherent similarities and differences.
In this paper, we present six extensions to the multi-skilled resource-constrained project scheduling problem (MSRCPSP) by introducing hierarchical levels of skills. These hierarchical skills can impact the MSRCPSP in multiple different ways. This paper studies efficiency differences, cost differences, quality differences and more. For each of these problems we propose and analyse seven continuous and time-indexed (mixed-)integer linear programming formulations. A modular artificial dataset is generated that assembles instances of the presented problems as well as combinations of these problems. In the computational experiments, we solve these instances using the proposed mathematical formulations with the CPLEX solver. Finally, we compare the results of the different formulations for the resource-constrained project scheduling problems with hierarchical levels of skills in order to explain their inherent similarities and differences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据