4.7 Article

Spine-GFlow: A hybrid learning framework for robust multi-tissue segmentation in lumbar MRI without manual annotation

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2022.102091

关键词

Multi -tissue segmentation; Auto -annotation; Weakly -supervised segmentation; Spine

资金

  1. Innovation and Technology Fund, Hong Kong [ITS/404/18]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a hybrid framework called Spine-GFlow, which combines CNN model learned image features and anatomical priors for multi-tissue segmentation in sagittal lumbar MRI without manual annotation. The experimental results show that this method achieves comparable segmentation performance to fully supervised models.
Most learning-based magnetic resonance image (MRI) segmentation methods rely on the manual annotation to provide supervision, which is extremely tedious, especially when multiple anatomical structures are required. In this work, we aim to develop a hybrid framework named Spine-GFlow that combines the image features learned by a CNN model and anatomical priors for multi-tissue segmentation in a sagittal lumbar MRI. Our framework does not require any manual annotation and is robust against image feature variation caused by different image settings and/or underlying pathology. Our contributions include: 1) a rule-based method that automatically generates the weak annotation (initial seed area), 2) a novel proposal generation method that integrates the multi-scale image features and anatomical prior, 3) a comprehensive loss for CNN training that optimizes the pixel classification and feature distribution simultaneously. Our Spine-GFlow has been validated on 2 independent datasets: HKDDC (containing images obtained from 3 different machines) and IVDM3Seg. The segmentation results of vertebral bodies (VB), intervertebral discs (IVD), and spinal canal (SC) are evaluated quantitatively using intersection over union (IoU) and the Dice coefficient. Results show that our method, without requiring manual annotation, has achieved a segmentation performance comparable to a model trained with full supervision (mean Dice 0.914 vs 0.916).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据