4.4 Article

Interpolation of planar G1 data by Pythagorean-hodograph cubic biarcs with prescribed arc lengths

期刊

COMPUTER AIDED GEOMETRIC DESIGN
卷 96, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cagd.2022.102119

关键词

Geometric interpolation; Pythagorean-hodograph curve; Cubic biarc; Arc length; System of nonlinear equations

资金

  1. Slovenian Research Agency [P1-0222, P1-0288, J1-9104, N1-0137, J1-3005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses the interpolation problem of planar parametric cubic curves with prescribed arc lengths for two points and two tangent directions. By using Pythagorean-hodograph (PH) curves, the problem can be simplified and closed form solutions are provided.
The interpolation of two points and two tangent directions by planar parametric cubic curves with prescribed arc lengths is considered. It is well known that this problem is highly nonlinear if standard cubic curves are used. However, if Pythagorean-hodograph (PH) curves are considered, the problem simplifies due to their distinguished property that the arc length is a polynomial function of its coefficients. Since a single segment of a PH cubic curve does not provide enough free parameters, the so called PH cubic biarcs are used. A detailed and thorough analysis of the resulting system of nonlinear equations is provided and closed form solutions are given for any possible configuration of given data. The lookup table of the solutions is constructed enabling an easy implementation of the described method. Some quantities arising from geometric properties of the resulting curves are suggested in order to select the most appropriate one and the bending energy is confirmed as the most promising selection criterion. Several numerical examples are presented which confirm theoretical results. Finally, an example of approximation of an analytic curve by G(1) PH cubic biarc spline curve is presented and the approximation order is numerically established. (C) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据