4.7 Article

Flame-retardant nanocoating towards high-efficiency suppression of smoke and toxic gases for polymer foam

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107021

关键词

A; Foams; Nanoparticles; B; flame retardancy; Smoke suppression

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51991351, 22175123, U19A2045, 52122302, 51790504]
  2. Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST, Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2020YFH0016, 2020YFG0470]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the central Universities
  4. 111 project [B20001]
  5. Open and Innovative Fund of Hubei Three Gorges Laboratory [SC213011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a environmentally friendly and simple flame-retardant nanocoating for flexible polyurethane foam (FPUF) is demonstrated. The nanocoating effectively suppresses smoke and toxic gas release in fire. It reduces peak heat release rate, smoke density, and production of toxic gases, showing excellent extinguishing performance.
In this study, we demonstrate an environmentally friendly and facile flame-retardant nanocoating that can effectively suppress smoke and toxic gas release in fire for flexible polyurethane foam (FPUF). In this water-based functional coating system, nanoporous sepiolite nanofibers are wrapped by phytic aid to have a negative charge, and then together with the positively charged CH, are stably deposited onto the surface of FPUF through Layer by-Layer assembly. Only one bilayer of CH/SEP@PA coating can significantly reduce the peak heat release rate by 46%. The smoke density and the peak production of toxic CO and NOx have been greatly decreased by 77%, 52%, and 65%, and it shows an excellent extinguishing performance and easily passes the vertical burning test. Further, the nanocoating has little effect on the mechanical properties. This work provides a new strategy for the design of flame-retardant coatings with high-efficiency suppression of smoke and toxic gases for polymer foams.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据