4.7 Article

Vibration and flexural performance of cross-laminated timber - glulam composite floors

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 292, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115682

关键词

Mass-timber construction; Cross-laminated timber; Floor vibration; Hybrid connections

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents experimental research on composite cross-laminated timber (CLT) glulam floors. The findings suggest that the different types of connectors used for composite action have negligible influence on the dynamic properties of the floor segments. The composite panels demonstrate acceptable vibration performance and linear load-deformation behavior. The gamma method is shown to be adequate for predicting the performance of CLT-glulam composite floors.
This paper presents experimental research on composite cross-laminated timber (CLT) glulam floors. The composite action was achieved using three different types of connectors. The connector stiffness and strength were determined with small-scale shear tests. Quasi-static monotonic four-point bending and vibration tests were conducted on six full-scale (9.1 m long, 1.6 m wide) double T-beam floor segments consisting of 3-ply CLT panels and two glulam beams. The vibration test results indicated that the three connection types had negligible influence on the dynamic properties of the composite floor segments, while the allowable vibration controlled span of the composite panel was around 7.2 m with acceptable subjective evaluations. The load-deformation behaviour observed in the full-scale testing was linear up to failure which was brittle tension at mid-span in one of the glulam beams for all specimens. The ratio between experimental and expected bending stiffness was close to 1.0 for all three connector types demonstrating the adequacy of applying the gamma method to predict the performance of CLT-glulam composite floors. The findings from this research supported the design and construction of the floors for two new school buildings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据