4.6 Review

VALGENT: A protocol for clinical validation of human papillomavirus assays

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY
卷 76, 期 -, 页码 S14-S21

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2015.09.014

关键词

Human papillomavirus; Cervical cancer; Cervical cancer screening; Diagnostic test accuracy; Test validation; Quality control

类别

资金

  1. European Commission [603019]
  2. Joint Action CANCON from the European Union
  3. German Guideline Program in Oncology (German Cancer Aid project) [110163]
  4. National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (Bilthoven, the Netherlands)
  5. Chief Scientist Office [CZB/4/658] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Testing for high-risk HPV is more effective in primary cervical cancer screening than the cytological examination of a Pap smear. Separate genotyping may be useful for triage in both HPV-based and cytology-based screening. Only clinically validated tests should be used in clinical practice. Objectives: VALGENT is a study framework for test comparison and validation of HPV assays in general and HPV genotyping tests in particular according to clinically relevant outcomes and for clinical applications endorsed by scientific evidence. Study design: VALGENT involves the collation of fresh or archived cervical cell specimen from women attending routine screening supplemented with cytologically abnormal samples. Multiple aliquots of residual material are sent from a central laboratory to participating laboratories for testing with novel HPV assays with limited, extended or full genotyping capacity. Outcomes are derived from screening and pathology registries. Each VALGENT panel includes an assay already validated for screening. A series of accuracy and concordance statistics were generated. Results: Currently, two VALGENT study rounds, originated from laboratories in Antwerp (Belgium) and Edinburgh (Scotland), were completed. Two new assays (G5+/6+ PCR-LMNX and Xpert HPV) were validated for screening by showing similar accuracy for cervical precancer as the standard comparator test. For two other tests (BD Onclarity, PapilloCheck) validation was confirmed. Inter-test agreement was high although certain type-specific discordances were observed which warrant further analysis. Conclusion: VALGENT extends current guidelines for high-risk HPV test validation in cervical cancer screening and has produced a large study resource for test comparison. More robust procedures of sample selection and handling and integration with the global WHO reference laboratory network focusing on analytical accuracy, may result in the generation of an international standard and a formalized system for clinical validation of HPV assays and quality control in HPV-based screening. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据