4.7 Article

Impact of Gastric Electrical Stimulation on Economic Burden of Refractory Vomiting: A French Nationwide Multicentre Study

期刊

CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
卷 20, 期 8, 页码 1857-+

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.11.011

关键词

Gastric Electrical Stimulation; Enterra Therapy; Gastroparesis Symptoms; Cost-effectiveness

资金

  1. STIC grant (Soutien aux Therapeutiques Innovantes et Couteuses) from the French Health Office (Ministere de la Sante)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and medico-economic impact of Enterra therapy for chronic medically refractory nausea and vomiting. The results showed that Enterra therapy significantly improved the gastrointestinal quality of life index score and reduced vomiting frequency. It also decreased healthcare costs and resulted in savings for the patients.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Medico-economic data of patients suffering from chronic nausea and vomiting are lacking. In these patients, gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is an effective, but costly treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy, safety and medico-economic impact of Enterra therapy in patients with chronic medically refractory nausea and vomiting. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively from patients with medically refractory nausea and/or vomiting, implanted with an Enterra device and followed for two years. Gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) score, vomiting frequency, nutritional status and safety were evaluated. Direct and indirect expenditure data were prospectively collected in diaries. RESULTS: Complete clinical data were available for142 patients (60 diabetic, 82 non-diabetic) and medico-economic data were available for 96 patients (36 diabetic, 60 non-diabetic), 24 months after implantation. GIQLI score increased by 12.1 - 25.0 points (p <.001), with a more significant improvement in non-diabetic than in diabetic patients (D15.8 - 25.0 points, p <.001 versus 7.3 - 24.5 points, p =.027, respectively). The proportion of patients vomiting less than once per month increased by 25.5% (p <.001). Hospitalisations, time off work and transport were the main sources of costs. Enterra therapy decreased mean overall healthcare costs from 8873 US$ to 5525 US$ /patient/year (p =.001), representing a saving of 3348 US$ per patient and per year. Savings were greater for diabetic patients (4096 US$ /patient/year) than for nondiabetic patients (2900 US$ /patient/year). CONCLUSIONS: Enterra therapy is an effective, safe and cost-effective option for patients with refractory nausea and vomiting. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00903799

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据