4.7 Article

Novel DNA Methylation Biomarker Panel for Detection of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and High-Grade Dysplasia

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 28, 期 17, 页码 3761-3769

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-0445

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI [R50CA233042]
  2. NIH [UO1CA152756, RO1CA220004, P30CA015704, U54CA163060, UO1CA086402, UO1CA182940]
  3. Prevent Cancer Foundation [UO1CA152756, U54CA163060, P50CA150964, P30DK097948]
  4. Exact Sciences
  5. Pentax Medical
  6. Cernostics
  7. Cottrell Family Fund
  8. Evergreen Fund
  9. Listwin Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identifies methylation markers that can distinguish esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and high-grade dysplasia (HGD) from normal squamous epithelium (SQ) or nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus (NDBE). The results demonstrate the potential of DNA methylation-based molecular assays for the early detection of EAC using esophageal brushing samples.
Purpose: Current endoscopy-based screening and surveillance programs have not been proven effective at decreasing esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) mortality, creating an unmet need for effective molecular tests for early detection of this highly lethal cancer. We conducted a genome-wide methylation screen to identify novel methylation markers that distinguish EAC and high-grade dysplasia (HGD) from normal squamous epithelium (SQ) or nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus (NDBE). Experimental Design: DNA methylation profiling of samples from SQ, NDBE, HGD, and EAC was performed using HM450 methylation arrays (Illumina) and reduced-representation bisulfate sequencing. Ultrasensitive methylation-specific droplet digital PCR and next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based bisulfite-sequencing assays were developed to detect the methylation level of candidate CpGs in independent esophageal biopsy and endoscopic brushing samples. Results: Five candidate methylation markers were significantly hypermethylated in HGD/EAC samples compared with SQ or NDBE (P < 0.01) in both esophageal biopsy and endoscopic brushing samples. In an independent set of brushing samples used to construct biomarker panels, a four-marker panel (model 1) demonstrated sensitivity of 85.0% and 90.8% for HGD and EACs respectively, with 84.2% and 97.9% specificity for NDBE and SQ respectively. In a validation set of brushing samples, the panel achieved sensitivity of 80% and 82.5% for HGD and EAC respectively, at specificity of 67.6% and 96.3% for NDBE and SQ samples. Conclusions: A novel DNA methylation marker panel differentiates HGD/EAC from SQ/NDBE. DNA-methylation-based molecular assays hold promise for the detection of HGD/EAC using esophageal brushing samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据