4.5 Article

Double-Cable Conjugated Polymers with Fullerene Pendant for Single-Component Organic Solar Cells

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 40, 期 8, 页码 898-904

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10118-022-2732-2

关键词

Double-cable conjugated polymers; Single-component organic solar cells; Fullerene; Donor-acceptor conjugated polymers; Microphase separation

资金

  1. Beijing Natural Science Foundation of China [JQ21006]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China of China [92163128, 52073016, 51773207, 21905018, 21905158]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [buctrc201828, XK1802-2]
  4. opening Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Organic-Inorganic Composites, Beijing University of Chemical Technology [oic-202201006]
  5. Jiangxi Provincial Department of Science and Technology [20192ACB20009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, fullerene-contained double-cable conjugated polymers were successfully constructed using the functionalization-polymerization method. The power conversion efficiencies were increased by enhancing the fullerene contents. These conjugated polymers with molecular heterojunction show potential application in organic electronic devices.
In this work, the functionalization-polymerization (FP) method has been used to construct fullerene-contained double-cable conjugated polymers with donor-acceptor backbones. It was realized via synthesizing a fullerene-contained monomer and performing Stille polymerization. With this method, a series of double-cable conjugated polymers with different fullerene contents were developed and applied into single-component organic solar cells. The power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) based on these polymers increased from 0.71% to 1.71% with the enhanced fullerene contents. The relatively low PCEs might be originated from the poor microstructure in these polymers. These new conjugated polymers with molecular heterojunction would show potential application in organic electronic devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据